![black cigarettes peaky blinders Cillian Murphy says he smoked more than 3,000 rose-based herbal cigarettes while filming Peaky Blinders, all to stay true to Tommy Shelby's chain-smoking persona. “People did smoke all day [in the 1920s],”](https://lookaside.fbsbx.com/lookaside/crawler/media/?media_id=122114623070218641 "black cigarettes peaky blinders Cillian Murphy says he smoked more than 3,000 rose-based herbal cigarettes while filming Peaky Blinders, all to stay true to Tommy Shelby's chain-smoking persona. “People did smoke all day [in the 1920s],”")
![black cigarettes peaky blinders Cillian Murphy says he smoked more than 3,000 rose-based herbal cigarettes while filming Peaky Blinders, all to stay true to Tommy Shelby's chain-smoking persona. “People did smoke all day [in the 1920s],”](https://ukvapescene.com/img/productpage/articles/lostmary600_clickme.jpg "black cigarettes peaky blinders Cillian Murphy says he smoked more than 3,000 rose-based herbal cigarettes while filming Peaky Blinders, all to stay true to Tommy Shelby's chain-smoking persona. “People did smoke all day [in the 1920s],”")
![black cigarettes peaky blinders Cillian Murphy says he smoked more than 3,000 rose-based herbal cigarettes while filming Peaky Blinders, all to stay true to Tommy Shelby's chain-smoking persona. “People did smoke all day [in the 1920s],”](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/90MAAOSwtJdmBvv-/s-l400.jpg "black cigarettes peaky blinders Cillian Murphy says he smoked more than 3,000 rose-based herbal cigarettes while filming Peaky Blinders, all to stay true to Tommy Shelby's chain-smoking persona. “People did smoke all day [in the 1920s],”")
★★★★★ 3
Sadly, DNF
Format: Kindle
I read this thru KU. I LOVED the synopsis. And then I began reading... and it was a DNF at 68% after picking it up and putting it down several times because I really loved the main female character.
*****SPOILERS*****
Pros:
The world is unique, intriguing and fun. The primary female character is bad-a** but not a b*tech or a mary sue. The primary female has depth. I really want to know what happens to her even tho it's been weeks and I don't remember her name. The villains to the point I read are pretty good -- an ever present threat of mysterious and possibly many culprits.
Cons:
Way, way too many points of view. I stopped counting at 7. It's the prime reason why I don't care about most of the characters or remember their names even when I like them. There's just too many points of view so almost none of the characters have enough book space for the author to properly develop them. This literally killed the book for me. Actually it killed my desire to read. For weeks.
The main male is more villain than hero. He agreed to marry the main female then locks her up & eschews her for her sister, all while bad mouthing her as unfit to rule when he never spent any time with her getting to know her. He is actually unfit to rule as he is blind to the woes of his own kingdom and starts off a peace mission to secure a ceasefire through marriage by murdering an inn full of people in her country for no real reason. Plus, he constantly makes promises he does not keep. And it's gross of him to pine for the sister behind the main female's back.
*****
As much as I really wanted to see what happened to the main female character, it wasn't enough for me to keep trying to slog thru this book. There was a lot of potential here that just fell short.
Hence, 3 stars.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 19, 2021
